Einstein Would've Been a New Atheist?
(Crossposted from www.c4chaos.com)

EINSTEIN AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT
Uploaded by *olivervo on 16 Jun 06, 11.40PM PDT.
If Einstein were alive today would he back up the New Atheists?
It's hard to say. It's possible that Einstein would have a more evolved and sophisticated belief system if he's still alive. But based on his 1954 letter to the philosopher Eric Gutkind, he sounds more like Hitchens or Harris. (Even Dawkins is claiming Einstein as an Atheist.)
"Albert Einstein described belief in God as "childish superstition" and said Jews were not the chosen people, in a letter to be sold in London this week, an auctioneer said Tuesday.
"The father of relativity, whose previously known views on religion have been more ambivalent and fuelled much discussion, made the comments in response to a philosopher in 1954.
"As a Jew himself, Einstein said he had a great affinity with Jewish people but said they 'have no different quality for me than all other people'.
"'The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish.
"'No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this,' he wrote in the letter written on January 3, 1954 to the philosopher Eric Gutkind, cited by The Guardian newspaper." [read more]
Word.
ADDENDUM: Some say that Einstein was a genius, not a mystic. I beg to differ. If the definition of a mystic is "someone who believes in the existence of realities beyond human comprehension," then Einstein certainly qualified. Here's a relevant quote (via Quantum Questions). Emphasis mine.
"If it is one of the goals of religion to liberate mankind as far as possible from the bondage of egocentric cravings, desires, and fears, scientific reasoning can aid religion in yet another sense. Although it is true that it is the goal of science to discover rules which permit the association and foretelling of facts, this is not its only aim. It also seeks to reduce the connections discovered to the smallest possible number of mutually independent conceptual elements. It is in this striving after the rational unification of the manifold that it encounters its greatest successes, even though it is precisely this attempt which causes it to run the greatest risk of falling a prey to illusions. But whoever has undergone the intense experience of successful advances made in this domain is moved by profound reverence for the rationality made manifest in existence. By way of the understanding he achieves a far-reaching emancipation from the shackles of personal hopes and desires, and thereby attains that humble attitude of mind toward the grandeur of reason incarnate in existence, and which, in its profoundest depths, is inaccessible to man. This attitude, however, appears to me to be religious, in the highest sense of the word. And so it seems to me that science not only purifies the religious impulse of the dross of its anthropomorphism but also contributes to a religious spiritualization of our understanding of life."
So, to me, Einstein was both a genius and a mystic. But a mystic who spoke in a non-metaphysical (or non-New Agey) language.







Wow. I've always been a bit put off by those other “ambivalent” quotes…thank you for posting this!
I have always been torn on what belief Einstein has held. Many of his writings suggest that he believes in no superior being; in no higher power than science; but some of what he says seems to be far more against religion and the teaching of God as oppossed to being against God “itself”.
“It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.”
“I cannot conceive of a personal God who would directly influence the actions of individuals, or would directly sit in judgment on creatures of his own creation. I cannot do this in spite of the fact that mechanistic causality has, to a certain extent, been placed in doubt by modern science.
My religiosity consists in a humble admiration of the infinitely superior spirit that reveals itself in the little that we, with our weak and transitory understanding, can comprehend of reality. Morality is of the highest importance-but for us, not for God.”
http://www.sacred-texts.com/aor/einstein/einprayr.htm#GOD
It would seem, in my interpretation, that perhaps he does believe in a superior being or even another being in general. I think that he is more aiming his attacks on the perspective we have on such a Being and how this Being is being taught. Further, it would also seem that he is of the belief that the existance of God does not matter, it is HOW we live that should matter and at that, not for any possibility of God, but for ourselves.
Those are just some of my thoughts though.
Be well.
Cryptic, thanks for the link! it gave me another perspective on Einstein's belief.
~C
Finally, the King of Science speaks! Now we know what to believe!